Did This Requirment to Purchase this Vendor's "Single Interest" Insurance Constitute a Truth-in-Lending (TILA) Violation?
Randolph, an Alabama resident, bought a mobile home that was financed by Green Tree Financial. The finance agreement contained a standard arbitration clause, requiring the consumer to arbitrate any and all disputes arising out of the arrangement. Nonetheless, Randolph brought a class action against Green Tree in federal court for requiring her and other consumer/debtors to obtain "vendor's single interest" insurance (which protects a vendor or lien holder against the costs of repossession in the event of default) without setting forth this requirement in its Truth in Lending Act disclosure. . . . (to read the remainder of this article, please log in below.)
The resource you have requested is available only to current members.
If you are a current member, log in using the form below.
If you are not a member, we invite you to view the subscriber benefits at Membership Benefits
Forgotten Password? If you are a current member and have forgotten your password, enter your email address below, and your password will be emailed to you.
If your membership has expired and you wish to renew, visit the Membership Benefits Page.
|
Membership has its advantages
A subscription to CollectionForum.com gets you instant access to:
- Collection Letters in our easy-to-use download section that you can start to use today to begin tackling all your thorny collection issues
- Expert advice from from the leading experts on all aspects of collections
- Downloadable checklists to help you manage your collections
- Downloadable letters that are ready to go right away or easily modified to fit your situation
- Access to our excluse, members-only Collection Forum, where you can reach out to peers and experts to find solutions to your toughest collection and A/R issues.
- And much more!
Subscribe today and get all this and more. Just $99 and $12.95 per month thereafter. Join now using our secure
online order form.
|
|
|
|